Ortega v. State

230 So. 2d 177
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 1970·No. No. 2655·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Harrington v. California, 1969, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284; Chapman v. California, 1969, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705; State v. Youngblood, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 98; State v. Young, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 567; and State v. Galasso, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 326.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortega v. State, 230 So. 2d 177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

230 So. 2d 177 (Ortega v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Harrington v. California
395 U.S. 250 (Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Young
217 So. 2d 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
State v. Galasso
217 So. 2d 326 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
State v. Youngblood
217 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)