Orpen v. Watson

96 A. 43, 88 N.J.L. 379, 3 Gummere 379, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 333

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Devlin v. Wilson (ante p. 180), delivered at the present term, the judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SWAY'ZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MlNTURN, KALISCH, Black, Yredenburgi-i, White, Terhune, Williams, Taylor, J J. 14.

For reversal—None.