Ormand v. White

85 Miss. 276
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is far too late now to question in Mississippi the constitutionality of the statutes like the. one here assailed. That the act is constitutional is thoroughly settled by the cases of Schulherr v. Bordeaux, 64 Miss., 59 (8 South. Rep., 201), and Alcorn v. Hamer, 38 Miss., 652, with the authorities cited in these two cases and in the briefs of counsel in the two cases. The case [277] so strongly relied on by counsel for appellant, Lammert v. Lidwell, 62 Mo., 188 (21 Am. St. Rep., 411), was also relied on in tbo case of Schullherr v. Bordeaux, above cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ormand v. White, 85 Miss. 276 (Mich. 1904).

85 Miss. 276 (Ormand v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Harrison County Election Commission
183 So. 2d 630 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Gully v. Wilmut Gas & Oil Co.
165 So. 626 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Moss v. Mississippi Live Stock Sanitary Board
122 So. 776 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Ex parte Fritz
86 Miss. 210 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1905)