Ormand v. White

85 Miss. 276
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 85 Miss. 276 (Ormand v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ormand v. White, 85 Miss. 276 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is far too late now to question in Mississippi the constitutionality of the statutes like the. one here assailed. That the act is constitutional is thoroughly settled by the cases of Schulherr v. Bordeaux, 64 Miss., 59 (8 South. Rep., 201), and Alcorn v. Hamer, 38 Miss., 652, with the authorities cited in these two cases and in the briefs of counsel in the two cases. The case [277]*277so strongly relied on by counsel for appellant, Lammert v. Lidwell, 62 Mo., 188 (21 Am. St. Rep., 411), was also relied on in tbo case of Schullherr v. Bordeaux, above cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Harrison County Election Commission
183 So. 2d 630 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Gully v. Wilmut Gas & Oil Co.
165 So. 626 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Moss v. Mississippi Live Stock Sanitary Board
122 So. 776 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Ex parte Fritz
86 Miss. 210 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Miss. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ormand-v-white-miss-1904.