Orlean Ayers v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2014·No. 14-13-00229-CR·Published

Opinion

Appeal Reinstated; Order filed January 30, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00229-CR ____________

ORLEAN AYERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 597938

ORDER

This is an appeal from the denial of relief following post-conviction DNA testing. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The record has been forwarded to appellant. Appellant requested that the record be supplemented with his motion for “objection for the preservation of appellate review pursuant to art. 64.04” dated February 5, 2013. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the missing document has now been filed. Accordingly, we issue the following order.

The appeal is ordered reinstated and appellant is directed to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief on or before March 3, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orlean Ayers v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Orlean Ayers v. State (Orlean Ayers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)