Orlean Ayers v. State
This text of Orlean Ayers v. State (Orlean Ayers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Reinstated; Order filed January 30, 2014.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00229-CR ____________
ORLEAN AYERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 597938
ORDER
This is an appeal from the denial of relief following post-conviction DNA testing. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The record has been forwarded to appellant. Appellant requested that the record be supplemented with his motion for “objection for the preservation of appellate review pursuant to art. 64.04” dated February 5, 2013. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the missing document has now been filed. Accordingly, we issue the following order.
The appeal is ordered reinstated and appellant is directed to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief on or before March 3, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Orlean Ayers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orlean-ayers-v-state-texapp-2014.