Orgertrice v. Nash

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Orgertrice v. Nash

450 S.E.2d 708, 215 Ga. App. 119, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3599, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1153

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 2, 1994

DocketA94A2387

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 450 S.E.2d 708 (Orgertrice v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Orgertrice v. Nash, 450 S.E.2d 708, 215 Ga. App. 119, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3599, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1153 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Appellant William O. Orgertrice, Jr., has filed a direct appeal from the final judgment of the state court entering judgment in favor of appellant after reducing the jury verdict of $5,348.78 by set-off in the amount of $4,600.

This case arose as a suit for damages as a result of injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile collision; therefore, as this is an appeal from an action in damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less, appellant was required to follow the discretionary appeals procedure. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-35. See generally CaShar, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 204 Ga. App. 865 (420 SE2d 810); Heuer Indus. v. Crum, 202 Ga. App. 675 (415 SE2d 307).

Appeal dismissed.

Blackburn and Ruffin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Appellant William O. Orgertrice, Jr., has filed a direct appeal from the final judgment of the state court entering judgment in favor of appellant after reducing the jury verdict of $5,348.78 by set-off in the amount of $4,600.

This case arose as a suit for damages as a result of injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile collision; therefore, as this is an appeal from an action in damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less, appellant was required to follow the discretionary appeals procedure. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-35. See generally CaShar, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 204 Ga. App. 865 (420 SE2d 810); Heuer Indus. v. Crum, 202 Ga. App. 675 (415 SE2d 307).

Appeal dismissed.

Blackburn and Ruffin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

450 S.E.2d 708, 215 Ga. App. 119, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3599, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orgertrice-v-nash-gactapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack