HEUER INDUSTRIALS, INC. v. Crum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

HEUER INDUSTRIALS, INC. v. Crum

415 S.E.2d 307, 202 Ga. App. 675, 33 Fulton County D. Rep. 24, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 118

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 4, 1992

DocketA92A0846

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 415 S.E.2d 307 (HEUER INDUSTRIALS, INC. v. Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HEUER INDUSTRIALS, INC. v. Crum, 415 S.E.2d 307, 202 Ga. App. 675, 33 Fulton County D. Rep. 24, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

Crum sued Heuer Industrials, Inc., in a dispute over the terms of a real estate sales contract, and obtained a judgment for damages in the amount of $3,289.70, from which Heuer Industrials filed this direct appeal on January 28, 1992.

Prior to July 1, 1991, a direct appeal could be brought in actions for damages in which the judgment exceeded $2,500. See former OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). For appeals filed on or after July 1, 1991, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) was amended to reflect that “[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less” must be taken by the application procedures set forth within the Code section. Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the discretionary application procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35. Covrig v. Campbell, 187 Ga. App. 39, 40 (369 SE2d 293) (1988).

Appeal dismissed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur. *676 Bowles & Bowles, Jesse G. Bowles III, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, Judge.

Crum sued Heuer Industrials, Inc., in a dispute over the terms of a real estate sales contract, and obtained a judgment for damages in the amount of $3,289.70, from which Heuer Industrials filed this direct appeal on January 28, 1992.

Prior to July 1, 1991, a direct appeal could be brought in actions for damages in which the judgment exceeded $2,500. See former OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). For appeals filed on or after July 1, 1991, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) was amended to reflect that “[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less” must be taken by the application procedures set forth within the Code section. Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the discretionary application procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35. Covrig v. Campbell, 187 Ga. App. 39, 40 (369 SE2d 293) (1988).

Appeal dismissed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur. *676 Bowles & Bowles, Jesse G. Bowles III, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 S.E.2d 307, 202 Ga. App. 675, 33 Fulton County D. Rep. 24, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heuer-industrials-inc-v-crum-gactapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack