Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON, Sanctioned Parties-Appellants ______________________

2015-1056 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:02-cv-60478-WJZ, Judge William J. Zloch. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for appellants.

TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Boston, MA; WILLIAM M. JAY, Wash- ington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court