Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 F.3d 1356 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 28, 2012·No. 21-1107·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wnfteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~frtuft

ALEXANDERS.ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1308

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION

ORDER Citrix Systems, Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until December 20, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. ORENSHTEYN V. CITRIX SYSTEMS 2

FOR THE COURT

NOV 28 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Joseph J. Zito, Esq. Douglas J. Kline, Esq. s21 COURf~~~PEALS u.s.THE FEDER~.'- rmCUlTfOR NOV 28 ZU1L JAN HORBAlY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wnfteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~frtuft

ALEXANDERS.ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1308

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION

FOR THE COURT

NOV 28 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Joseph J. Zito, Esq. Douglas J. Kline, Esq. s21 COURf~~~PEALS u.s.THE FEDER~.'- rmCUlTfOR NOV 28 ZU1L JAN HORBAlY CLERK

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc. (Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.