Orchard Group, Incorporated v. Konica Medical Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Sixth Circuit

Orchard Group, Incorporated v. Konica Medical Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

143 F.3d 1020, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10489, 1998 WL 297189

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1998·No. 96-3686, 96-3687·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges [1021]*1021of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges [1021]*1021of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Orchard Group, Incorporated v. Konica Medical Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 143 F.3d 1020, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10489, 1998 WL 297189 (6th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

143 F.3d 1020 (Orchard Group, Incorporated v. Konica Medical Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related