Oppenheimer v. City of New York

149 A.D. 175, 133 N.Y.S. 743, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6364

This text of 149 A.D. 175 (Oppenheimer v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oppenheimer v. City of New York, 149 A.D. 175, 133 N.Y.S. 743, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Clarke, J.:

This is a similar motion to that presented in Oppenheimer v. City of New York (Chelsea Bank) (149 App. Div. 172), handed down herewith, the Security Bank having procured an order for its introduction as defendant, basing its application upon an assignment of forty thousand dollars out of the retained percentages, and for the reasons set forth in the preceding case the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oppenheimer v. City of New York
149 A.D. 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.D. 175, 133 N.Y.S. 743, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheimer-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1912.