Oppenheim & Macnow, P. C. v. Worth

103 A.D.2d 687, 477 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19301
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 103 A.D.2d 687 (Oppenheim & Macnow, P. C. v. Worth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oppenheim & Macnow, P. C. v. Worth, 103 A.D.2d 687, 477 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered September 12, 1983, which struck defendant’s pleading for failure to appear in response to a court-ordered examination before trial and which dismissed as moot defendant’s cross motion to preclude, unanimously reversed, so far as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and motion to strike denied, on condition that defendant pay $500 costs to plaintiff and submit to oral examination at a time, place and date to be fixed in the order to be entered herein, which shall be within 20 days after entry of said order, without costs of the appeal. In the event defendant shall fail to comply with these conditions, the order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Settle order within 10 days. 11 We are not satisfied that the actions of defendant and her counsel were so willful and contumacious as to warrant the extreme penalty of striking her answer for a first default in appearance. However, they do warrant the imposition of sanctions to compensate for the additional time and expense incurred by plaintiff. ¶ Settle order within 10 days. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dehaney v. New York City Transit Authority
180 Misc. 2d 695 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)
Imex Discovery Resources, Inc. v. Allstate Hosiery Mills, Inc.
156 A.D.2d 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Paris v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
133 A.D.2d 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Delaney v. Automated Bread Corp.
110 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.2d 687, 477 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-macnow-p-c-v-worth-nyappdiv-1984.