O'Porto Holding Co., Ltd. v. Estate of Boone

67 A.D.3d 612, 888 N.Y.S.2d 406

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered on or about March 5, 2009, which, after a nonjury trial, found that plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of possession, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There is no basis for disturbing the trial court’s finding, based on its credibility determinations and the sparse documentary [613] evidence (see 300 E. 34th St. Co. v Habeeb, 248 AD2d 50, 54-55 [1997]), that defendants failed to meet their burden of proving that Angela Boone’s apartment was her grandson Taylor’s primary residence for the two years preceding her death (see Gottlieb v Licursi, 191 AD2d 256 [1993]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Nardelli, Catterson, DeGrasse and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Porto Holding Co., Ltd. v. Estate of Boone, 67 A.D.3d 612, 888 N.Y.S.2d 406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 612 (O'Porto Holding Co., Ltd. v. Estate of Boone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gottlieb v. Licursi
191 A.D.2d 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
300 East 34th Street Co. v. Habeeb
248 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)