Gottlieb v. Licursi
Opinion
—Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered October 30, 1991, which [257] reversed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Peter M. Wendt, H.J.), entered March 5, 1990, awarding respondent-tenant possession of the subject rent-controlled apartment, and awarded a judgment of possession in favor of petitioner-landlord, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
While Appellate Term may have erred in retroactively applying the two year residency requirement of amended New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 NYCRR) § 2204.6 (d) (1) in determining whether respondent Licursi, a family member of the deceased tenant of record, qualified as a successor tenant (911 Alwyn Owners Corp. v Estate of Rosenthal, 190 AD2d 621), the result was nevertheless correct, Licursi having failed to meet her burden of proving that she lived with the decedent in a manner "bearing some indicia of permanence or continuity” (829 Seventh Ave. Co. v Reider, 67 NY2d 930, 932-933). As found by Appellate Term, respondent maintained ownership of a house in White Plains, and filed her income tax return from, and registered to vote in, Westchester County throughout her claimed 18-month co-occupancy of the apartment (see, Goodhue House Co. v Bernstein, NYLJ, Dec. 7, 1981, at 14, col 3). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
191 A.D.2d 256 (Gottlieb v. Licursi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.