Gottlieb v. Licursi
This text of 191 A.D.2d 256 (Gottlieb v. Licursi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered October 30, 1991, which [257]*257reversed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Peter M. Wendt, H.J.), entered March 5, 1990, awarding respondent-tenant possession of the subject rent-controlled apartment, and awarded a judgment of possession in favor of petitioner-landlord, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
While Appellate Term may have erred in retroactively applying the two year residency requirement of amended New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 NYCRR) § 2204.6 (d) (1) in determining whether respondent Licursi, a family member of the deceased tenant of record, qualified as a successor tenant (911 Alwyn Owners Corp. v Estate of Rosenthal, 190 AD2d 621), the result was nevertheless correct, Licursi having failed to meet her burden of proving that she lived with the decedent in a manner "bearing some indicia of permanence or continuity” (829 Seventh Ave. Co. v Reider, 67 NY2d 930, 932-933). As found by Appellate Term, respondent maintained ownership of a house in White Plains, and filed her income tax return from, and registered to vote in, Westchester County throughout her claimed 18-month co-occupancy of the apartment (see, Goodhue House Co. v Bernstein, NYLJ, Dec. 7, 1981, at 14, col 3). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D.2d 256, 595 N.Y.S.2d 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottlieb-v-licursi-nyappdiv-1993.