Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided February 3, 2004·Published

Opinion

Dear Representative Peters,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. When a petitioner requests assistance with preparing a petition for a protective order under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act and other relevant Oklahoma law, who bears the responsibility for assisting the petitioner with the petition?

2. In jurisdictions in which a victim witness coordinator is located within the district attorney's office, does that jurisdiction's district attorney's office bear the responsibility for assisting the petitioner with the petition?

3. To what extent is the entity which bears the responsibility to assist the petitioner with the protective order petition required to assist the petitioner?

Introduction
¶ 1 In 1982, the Oklahoma Legislature enacted the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act ("Act"). 1982 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 255, § 1 (codified as amended at 22 O.S. 2001 Supp. 2003, §§ 60.1-60.16). One purpose of the Act is to provide "[a] victim of domestic abuse, a victim of stalking, a victim of harassment, a victim of rape, any adult or emancipated minor household member on behalf of any other family or household member who is a minor or incompetent, or any minor age sixteen (16) or seventeen (17) years," an opportunity to file a petition for an emergency ex parte protective order from the district court. 22 O.S. Supp.2003, § 60.2[22-60.2](A). A standard form for completing the petition for a protective order was initially developed and made a part of the statute. See 1982 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 255, § 3(B). That form was to be provided by the court clerk. Id. The Act was amended in 2003 to delete the requirement that the statutory standardized form be used, providing instead that the Administrative Office of the Courts develop a standard form for the petition of an emergency ex parte protective order. See 2003 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 407, § 2(B) (amending 22 O.S. 2001, § 60.2[22-60.2](B)). The form is still to be provided by the court clerk. Id.

¶ 2 The Act provides that if the court finds sufficient grounds within the scope of the Act stated in the petition, "the court shall hold an ex parte hearing on the same day the petition is filed." 22 O.S. Supp. 2003, § 60.3[22-60.3](A). For "good cause shown at the hearing," the court is authorized to issue any emergency ex parte order to protect the victim from "immediate and present danger of domestic abuse, stalking, or harassment." Id. The emergency ex parte order is to remain in effect until a full hearing is conducted. Id.

¶ 3 Originally the statute governing who was required to assist the person seeking relief, also referred to as the plaintiff or petitioner, in preparing the petition for a protective order provided:

D. The plaintiff shall prepare the petition as set forth above or, at the request of the plaintiff, the clerk of the court or the victim-witness coordinator shall prepare or assist the plaintiff in preparing the same.

1982 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 255, § 3.

¶ 4 The statute was amended during the 2003 First Regular Session of the Oklahoma Legislature and the section regarding preparation of the petition now reads:

D. The person seeking relief shall prepare the petition or, at the request of the plaintiff, the court clerk or the victim-witness coordinator, victim support person,1 and court case manager shall prepare or assist the plaintiff in preparing the petition.

22 O.S. Supp. 2003, § 60.2[22-60.2] (footnote added).

I.
¶ 5 You first ask who bears the responsibility for assisting the person seeking relief with preparing the petition. The amended statute references four persons who may prepare the petition, or assist the petitioner in preparing the petition. The four persons required to assist, at the petitioner's request, are: (1) the court clerk, (2) the victim-witness coordinator, (3) the victim support person, and (4) the court case manager. Id. The statute provides that they shall prepare, or assist the person seeking relief in preparing, the petition at the request of the plaintiff. Id. The language "at the request of the plaintiff," shows that it is the plaintiff's prerogative whom he or she chooses to ask for assistance in preparing the petition.Id. No one person bears more responsibility for preparing or assisting than any other.

¶ 6 The Legislature used the terms "or" and "and" in listing the four persons. The first two persons, the court clerk and the victim-witness coordinator, are separated by the word "or." The other two persons, the victim support person and the court case manager, are separated by a comma and the word "and." The courts have recognized the ambiguities that may arise from the use of "and" when "or" is meant, or vice versa. The Oklahoma Supreme Court set forth the appropriate rule of construction in OklahomaNational Life Insurance Co. v. Norton, 145 P. 1138, 1139 (Okla. 1915), as follows:

It must be assumed that the Legislature could not have intended to have produced an absurd or unreasonable result, or to express itself in terms which would defeat the very objects of the enactment; and, when such effect would follow a literal construction of the statute, the conjunctive particle may be read as disjunctive, or vice versa, on the theory that the word to be corrected was inserted by inadvertence or clerical error. While they are not treated as interchangeable, and should be followed when their accurate reading does not render their sense dubious, their strict meaning is more readily departed from than that of other words, and one may be read in place of the other to carry out the evident legislative intent.

Id. (quoting State ex rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, 98 P. 964,971 (Okla. 1908)).

¶ 7 The ambiguity here is created by the use of the word "or" separating the court clerk and the victim-witness coordinator, followed by the victim support person, and the use of the word "and" separating the victim support person from the court case manager. 22 O.S. Supp. 2003, § 60.2[22-60.2](D). Reading the word "and" in the conjunctive, the court case manager would be required to assist the petitioner in preparing the petition in every situation, regardless of whom the petitioner chose to assist him or her. Another possible interpretation would be that the petitioner could request either the court clerk or the victim-witness coordinator, or the petitioner could request the victim support person and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. (2004), (Okla. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion No. (2004) (Opinion No. (2004)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oklahoma Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Norton
1915 OK 28 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County Judge
1908 OK 244 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)