ONONDAGA TRUCK LEASE, INC. v. Hovell

270 A.2d 46, 111 N.J. Super. 549
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided October 9, 1970·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

111 N.J. Super. 549 (1970)
270 A.2d 46

ONONDAGA TRUCK LEASE, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
VICTOR C. HOVELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a CIRCLE SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 5, 1970.
Decided October 9, 1970.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and MOUNTAIN.

Mr. Joseph J. Talafous argued the cause for appellant (Mr. George E. Schneider, on the brief).

Respondent did not file a brief.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the reported opinion of Judge Cozzi, 107 N.J. Super. 463. Since there is no proof that there was an indivisible contract between the parties covering services, repairs and materials furnished to all of the vehicles leased to Seaboard by plaintiff, we are not called upon to determine whether, had such been the case, defendant would have been entitled to a lien on the specific vehicle seized for the entire amount of his bill for services rendered to all the Seaboard vehicles.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ONONDAGA TRUCK LEASE, INC. v. Hovell, 270 A.2d 46, 111 N.J. Super. 549 (N.J. Ct. App. 1970).

270 A.2d 46 (ONONDAGA TRUCK LEASE, INC. v. Hovell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Associates Commercial Corp. v. Wallia
511 A.2d 709 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Whitmore v. NJ Div. of Motor Vehicles
349 A.2d 560 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
State v. Thyfault
297 A.2d 873 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Borough of New Shrewsbury v. BLOCK 105
270 A.2d 46 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)