Borough of New Shrewsbury v. BLOCK 105
This text of 270 A.2d 46 (Borough of New Shrewsbury v. BLOCK 105) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BLOCK 105, LOT 11, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS, AND HERBERT HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.
Mrs. Sylvia B. Pressler argued the cause for appellant Herbert Harvey.
Mr. Martin M. Barger argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner & Carotenuto, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The questions raised on this appeal are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lane in his opinion for the Chancery Division reported at 104 N.J. Super. 360, and his oral opinions of January 30, 1969 and March 7, 1969.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.2d 46, 111 N.J. Super. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-new-shrewsbury-v-block-105-njsuperctappdiv-1970.