Onishea v. Hopper

Eleventh Circuit

Onishea v. Hopper

133 F.3d 1377, 1998 WL 27287

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 23, 1998·No. No. 96-6213·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 4, 1997, 11th Cir., 126 F.3d 1323).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 4, 1997, 11th Cir., 126 F.3d 1323).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Onishea v. Hopper, 133 F.3d 1377, 1998 WL 27287 (11th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

133 F.3d 1377 (Onishea v. Hopper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related