Onishea v. Hopper

Eleventh Circuit

Onishea v. Hopper

133 F.3d 1377, 1998 WL 27287

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1998

DocketNo. 96-6213

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 F.3d 1377 (Onishea v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Onishea v. Hopper, 133 F.3d 1377, 1998 WL 27287 (11th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 4, 1997, 11th Cir., 126 F.3d 1323).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI