O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
This text of 84 N.Y.S. 505 (O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged, to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The latter appeals from an order denying its motion for a bill of particulars as to the injuries which the plaintiff alleged that she believed were permanent, and as to the length of time during which plaintiff was confined to her home. Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 70 App. Div. 1, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1107, and Curtin v. Same, 65 App. Div. 610, 72 N. Y. Supp. 580, are authority that under a similar complaint the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars specifying what injuries the plaintiff claims to be permanent; and Steinau v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 63 App. Div. 126, 71 N. Y. Supp. 256, is au[506]*506thority'that the defendant is entitled to a statement of the length of time the plaintiff was confined to her home as a result of her injuries.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, so as to require the plaintiff to furnish the two items herein referred to, without costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.Y.S. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneill-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappdiv-1903.