Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
72 N.Y.S. 580
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1901·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The order should be reversed, with $io costs and disbursements, and the motion for a bill of particulars .granted, without costs, to the extent of requiring a bill of particulars specifying the nature and location of such of the plaintiff’s internal injuries mentioned in the complaint as she is informed and believes are permanent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 72 N.Y.S. 580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
72 N.Y.S. 580 (Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Chattanooga Iron Works
131 Tenn. 683 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Kist v. R. M. Haan & Co.
111 N.Y.S. 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
84 N.Y.S. 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)