O'Neill v. Boden-Wert Real Estate USA Fonds I, Ltd.

599 So. 2d 1045, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5796, 1992 WL 112128
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1992·No. No. 91-01361·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

We affirm the final judgment against appellants in this suit upon a mortgage note. One of the appellants, Boden-Wert IV, is a general partner of Royal Palm Square Associates, a general partnership which is in a chapter 11 reorganization. The other is Patrick J. O’Neill, a general partner of Boden-Wert IV.

Contrary to appellants’ contention, the automatic stay of proceedings against the chapter 11 partnership under 11 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. did not apply to appellants. See Bank Center Ltd. v. Papariella, 15 B.R. 64 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1981); In re Aboussie Bros. Construction Co., 8 B.R. 302 (Bankr.E.D.Mo.1981). Liability of a general partner exists independently of partnership liability. See §§ 620.09(1) and 620.63, Fla.Stat. (1985). See also In re Alton, 81 B.R. 97, 99 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1987); 8 Fla.Jur.2d Business Relationships §§ 513, 659 (1978). Appellants apparently [1046]*1046did not request a stay of proceedings against them pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105(a).

We do not find merit in appellants’ additional contentions.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Neill v. Boden-Wert Real Estate USA Fonds I, Ltd., 599 So. 2d 1045, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5796, 1992 WL 112128 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 1045 (O'Neill v. Boden-Wert Real Estate USA Fonds I, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stratton of Florida, Inc. v. Woolley
711 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)