O'Neil v. Farr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Neil v. Farr

240 A.D. 901

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

— Order in so far as it denies defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to amend her second amended complaint so as to make it more definite and certain affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of an order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 914.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order in so far as it denies defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to amend her second amended complaint so as to make it more definite and certain affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of an order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 914.]

O'Neil v. Farr, 240 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 901 (O'Neil v. Farr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.