O'Neil v. Farr
This text of 240 A.D. 901 (O'Neil v. Farr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order in so far as it denies defendants’ motion to require plaintiff to amend her second amended complaint so as to make it more definite and certain affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of an order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 914.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oneil-v-farr-nyappdiv-1933.