O'Neel v. City of Folsom

Opinion

----oo0oo----

FAUN O’NEEL, individually and No. 2:21-cv-02403 WBS DB as Guardian Ad Litem for her children B.T., A.O., D.O., and A.T., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FOLSOM, a public entity; SPENSER HEICHLINGER, an individual; MELANIE CATANIO, an individual; LOU WRIGHT, an individual; [FNU] AUSTIN, an individual; [FNU] HUSAR, an individual, DOE individuals; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a public entity; DOE DCFAS DEFENDANTS, individuals; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

----oo0oo---- After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for August 1, 2022, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). III. JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because plaintiffs assert claims alleging violation of their rights under the United States Constitution. Venue is undisputed and hereby found to be proper. The parties shall serve the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) on or before August 29, 2022. The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than July 28, 2023.1 With regard to expert testimony 1 Although the parties have suggested separate deadlines for (1) the close of “Non-Expert Discovery,” (2) expert intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before August 15, 2023. All discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by September 22, 2023. The word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later than September 22, 2023. All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before November 9, 2023. All motions shall be noticed for the next available hearing date. Counsel are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for February 26, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The conference shall be disclosures, (3) rebuttal expert disclosures, and (4) the close of “Expert Witness Discovery,” the court prefers to set two deadlines for expert disclosures and one date for the close of all discovery. attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties. Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements, and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing those statements. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial days. In providing the plain, concise statements of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled defenses thereto. If the case is to be tried to a jury, the parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case, which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury. The jury trial is set for April 23, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate that the trial will last five to seven days. A Settlement Conference with a magistrate judge will be set at the time of the Pretrial Conference. Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority ne nen nnn nnn nnn en en NO IND NE

present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. At least seven calendar days before the Settlement Conference counsel for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference Statement for review by the settlement judge. The Settlement Conference Statements shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge. Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided only by the undersigned judge. Dated: July 22, 2022 Atte th 2d. WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE