O'Neale v. Long
8 U.S. 60, 2 L. Ed. 550, 4 Cranch 60, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 366
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, that there was error in this, that the court below did not instruct the jury as prayed by the defendant. He observed, that the judges did not all agree upon the same grounds, some being of opinion, that the bonds were void, by reason of the interlineation, and others, that they were vacated by the rejection of them by the magistrate, and could not be set up again, without a new delivery.
Judgment reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Neale v. Long, 8 U.S. 60, 2 L. Ed. 550, 4 Cranch 60, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 366 (1807).
8 U.S. 60 (O'Neale v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moen v. Moen
N.D. California, 2023
Wright v. Farmers Insurance
W.D. Washington, 2021
Eaton v. Cavalia (USA) Inc.
N.D. California, 2020
Keilsohn v. Slaton
87 S.E. 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Tucker v. Stewart
97 N.W. 148 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Anderson v. Bellenger & Ralls
87 Ala. 334 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)
Yeager v. Musgrave
28 W. Va. 90 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Covert v. Shirk
58 Ind. 264 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
State ex rel. McCarty v. Pepper
31 Ind. 76 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1869)
Burton v. Baker
31 Barb. 241 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
People v. Brown
2 Doug. 9 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1845)
Humphreys v. Guillow
13 N.H. 385 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
State v. Hascall
6 N.H. 352 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)
Long v. Oneale
1 D.C. 233 (District of Columbia, 1804)