Long v. Oneale
1 D.C. 233
This text of 1 D.C. 233 (Long v. Oneale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Long v. Oneale, 1 D.C. 233 (D.D.C. 1804).
Opinion
was of opinion that the instruction prayed by Mr. Key ought to be given; but Kilty, C. J., being of a different opinion, and Fitzhugh, J., being absent, the instruction was not given.
The defendant took a bill of exceptions, and upon a writ of error, the judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. See 4 Cranch, 60.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Neale v. Long
8 U.S. 60 (Supreme Court, 1807)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-oneale-dcd-1804.