Omaly v. Swan
18 F. Cas. 689, 3 Mason C.C. 474
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided October 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
This question has been long since settled by the local law. In Amory v. Fairbanks, 3 Mass. 562, the supreme court of this state affirmed the right; and this court afterwards, in Hatch v. White [Case No. 6,209], recognised the same doctrine. It is too late now to controvert it. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Omaly v. Swan, 18 F. Cas. 689, 3 Mason C.C. 474 (circtdma 1824).
18 F. Cas. 689 (Omaly v. Swan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Voorhis v. Crutcher
123 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Webber v. Blanc
39 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1897)
Bliss v. Weil
14 Wis. 35 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1861)
Porter v. Pillsbury
36 Me. 278 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1853)
Hunt v. Stiles
10 N.H. 466 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)