Omaly v. Swan
18 F. Cas. 689, 3 Mason C.C. 474
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedOctober 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 18 F. Cas. 689 (Omaly v. Swan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Omaly v. Swan, 18 F. Cas. 689, 3 Mason C.C. 474 (circtdma 1824).
Opinion
This question has been long since settled by the local law. In Amory v. Fairbanks, 3 Mass. 562, the supreme court of this state affirmed the right; and this court afterwards, in Hatch v. White [Case No. 6,209], recognised the same doctrine. It is too late now to controvert it. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Voorhis v. Crutcher
123 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Webber v. Blanc
39 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1897)
Bliss v. Weil
14 Wis. 35 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1861)
Porter v. Pillsbury
36 Me. 278 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1853)
Hunt v. Stiles
10 N.H. 466 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 689, 3 Mason C.C. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omaly-v-swan-circtdma-1824.