Amory v. Fairbanks

3 Mass. 562
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1793
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 3 Mass. 562 (Amory v. Fairbanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amory v. Fairbanks, 3 Mass. 562 (Mass. 1793).

Opinion

Upon oyer of the bond and condition, the defendants pleaded in bar that, on the day when the said bond was executed, they conveyed to him, the said Amory, in fee and in mortgage, a certain tract oi parcel of land in Framingham, &c. [describing it], which same lands were conveyed as collateral security for the performance of the condition of said bond, and that the said Amory thereafter, because the defendants had not performed the condition of said bond, on the ninth day of April, 1789, entered into and took possession of the said mortgaged premises for the same debt, and has yet had, and now hath the peaceable possession and seisin of the same, and this they are ready to verify; wherefore they pray judgment, &c.

To this plea the plaintiff demurred generally; and the defendants joined in demurrer.

The Court overruled the plea in bar; whereupon the defendants confessed the forfeiture of the bond, and prayed to be heard in chancery.

Judgment was rendered that the plaintiff recover the amount of the penalty of the bond declared on; and execution was awarded “ for the sum of £185 10s. 9d., part of the [ * 563 ] *said penalty, being the balance due on said bond, after deducting the value of the land according to appraisement.”

Note. This is the case cited in Neivall Al., Administrators, vs. fFright, ante, page 150.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hadley Falls Trust Co. v. United States
110 F.2d 887 (First Circuit, 1940)
Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. Lowenstein
166 A. 538 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Harrison v. Hall
145 N.E. 737 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Fitchburg Co-operative Bank v. Normandin
236 Mass. 332 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Burges v. Souther
2 A. 441 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Dooley v. Potter
2 N.E. 935 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Worcester Mechanics' Savings Bank v. Thayer
136 Mass. 459 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)
Sprague v. Martin
13 N.W. 34 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1882)
Green v. Cross
45 N.H. 574 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1864)
Porter v. Pillsbury
36 Me. 278 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1853)
Burpee v. Parker
24 Vt. 567 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1852)
President of Portland Bank v. Fox
19 Me. 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Hunt v. Stiles
10 N.H. 466 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Morgan v. Plumb
9 Wend. 287 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)
Lovell v. Leland
3 Vt. 581 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1831)
Hedge v. Holmes
27 Mass. 380 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)
Lansing v. Goelet
9 Cow. 346 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1827)
Globe Insurance v. Lansing
5 Cow. 380 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Omaly v. Swan
18 F. Cas. 689 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1824)
Hatch v. White
11 F. Cas. 810 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, 1814)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Mass. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amory-v-fairbanks-mass-1793.