O.M. v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
This text of 2015 Ark. App. 528 (O.M. v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 528
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-466
O.M. Opinion Delivered September 30, 2015 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, V. EIGHTH DIVISION [NO. 60JV2014-11]
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE WILEY A. BRANTON, HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR JR., JUDGE CHILD APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge
O.M. appeals a Pulaski County Circuit Court order terminating her parental rights to
her son D.M. (d/o/b 01/26/2013).1 O.M.’s attorney has filed a motion to be relieved from
representation and a no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human
Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Rule 6-9(i) of the Rules of the Arkansas
Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. O.M. was sent a copy of her counsel’s motion and
brief along with a letter informing her of her right to file pro se points for reversal, but the
packet was returned “Attempted-Not Known.” O.M.’s attorney has no additional contact
information for her.
1 William May is the putative father of D.M. His rights were also terminated by this order, but he did not file a notice of appeal from that determination; thus, he is not a party to this appeal. Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 528
Having carefully examined the record and the no-merit brief, we conclude that counsel
has complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit
appeals in termination cases and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we
affirm by memorandum opinion the termination of O.M.’s parental rights. See In re
Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e)
(2014). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
GLADWIN, C.J., and HOOFMAN, J., agree.
Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ark. App. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/om-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2015.