Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

110 Ohio St. 3d 1242
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 16, 2006
DocketNo. 2005-1639
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 110 Ohio St. 3d 1242 (Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1242 (Ohio 2006).

Opinions

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court .on an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”).

{¶ 2} In any appeal from a decision of a county board of revision, R.C. 5717.03(B) requires the BTA to send a copy of its decision by certified mail to the Tax Commissioner, and R.C. 5717.04 requires that an appellant who wishes to challenge the BTA’s decision must serve the Tax Commissioner, who by statute must be made an appellee, with a copy of the notice of appeal by certified mail. In construing the substantially similar language of R.C. 5717.05, we held that the requirement of joinder and service is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Huber Hts. Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. Came (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 306, 308, 658 N.E.2d 744, 745. Likewise, appellant’s failure in this case to comply with its statutory obligation to serve the notice of appeal on the Tax Commissioner in the prescribed manner deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Am. Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147, 34 O.O. 8, 70 N.E.2d 93, paragraph one of the syllabus (“Where a statute confers the right of appeal, adherence to the conditions thereby imposed is essential to the enjoyment of the right conferred”).

{¶ 3} Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Upper Arlington v. McClain (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 1726 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
Gallick v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
2018 Ohio 717 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
Rambacher v. Testa
2016 Ohio 2897 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
Gides v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2014 Ohio 4086 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Musarra v. Cuyahoga Cty. Aud.
2012 Ohio 3967 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Spencer v. Freight Handlers, Inc.
2012 Ohio 880 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Foster v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2011 Ohio 5508 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
4747 Mann, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2011 Ohio 2593 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
US 23 Self Storage, L.L.C. v. Olentangy Local School Bd. of Edn.
2011 Ohio 442 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
In re Petition of CSX Transp., Inc.
2010 Ohio 1316 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins
112 Ohio St. 3d 1208 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Board of Education v. Delaware County Board of Revision
111 Ohio St. 3d 1213 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 Ohio St. 3d 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olympic-steel-inc-v-cuyahoga-county-board-of-revision-ohio-2006.