Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
This text of 110 Ohio St. 3d 1242 (Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
{¶ 1} This cause is before the court .on an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”).
{¶ 2} In any appeal from a decision of a county board of revision, R.C. 5717.03(B) requires the BTA to send a copy of its decision by certified mail to the Tax Commissioner, and R.C. 5717.04 requires that an appellant who wishes to challenge the BTA’s decision must serve the Tax Commissioner, who by statute must be made an appellee, with a copy of the notice of appeal by certified mail. In construing the substantially similar language of R.C. 5717.05, we held that the requirement of joinder and service is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Huber Hts. Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. Came (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 306, 308, 658 N.E.2d 744, 745. Likewise, appellant’s failure in this case to comply with its statutory obligation to serve the notice of appeal on the Tax Commissioner in the prescribed manner deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Am. Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147, 34 O.O. 8, 70 N.E.2d 93, paragraph one of the syllabus (“Where a statute confers the right of appeal, adherence to the conditions thereby imposed is essential to the enjoyment of the right conferred”).
{¶ 3} Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 Ohio St. 3d 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olympic-steel-inc-v-cuyahoga-county-board-of-revision-ohio-2006.