Olivier v. Hyland
This text of 186 F. 843 (Olivier v. Hyland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The enforcement of the neutrality laws of the United States is of necessity under the control of the government of the United States. Where a seizure is made on complaint of an informer for violation ©f section 11, Penal Laws of the United States, and the United States, through its proper representatives, intervenes, disavows, and declines to ratify the seizure, as in the instant case, the informer can have no such inchoate or other interest as will permit the further .prosecution of the case in his behalf.
The decree appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 F. 843, 108 C.C.A. 576, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivier-v-hyland-ca5-1911.