Olivier v. Hyland
186 F. 843, 108 C.C.A. 576, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4173
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1911·No. No. 2,093·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The enforcement of the neutrality laws of the United States is of necessity under the control of the government of the United States. Where a seizure is made on complaint of an informer for violation ©f section 11, Penal Laws of the United States, and the United States, through its proper representatives, intervenes, disavows, and declines to ratify the seizure, as in the instant case, the informer can have no such inchoate or other interest as will permit the further .prosecution of the case in his behalf.
The decree appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Olivier v. Hyland, 186 F. 843, 108 C.C.A. 576, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4173 (5th Cir. 1911).
186 F. 843 (Olivier v. Hyland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alan Bauer v. Mavi Marmara
774 F.3d 1026 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)
Bauer v. Mavi Marmara
942 F. Supp. 2d 31 (District of Columbia, 2013)