Oliver v. State

957 So. 2d 700, 2007 WL 1485445
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 2007·No. 3D07-961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

957 So.2d 700 (2007)

Everett A. OLIVER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D07-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 23, 2007.

Everett A. Oliver, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this court must *701 reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver v. State, 957 So. 2d 700, 2007 WL 1485445 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

957 So. 2d 700 (Oliver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. State
967 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Holladay v. State
957 So. 2d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)