Oliver v. Omaha

18 F. Cas. 672, 3 Dill. 368

This text of 18 F. Cas. 672 (Oliver v. Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oliver v. Omaha, 18 F. Cas. 672, 3 Dill. 368 (circtdne 1875).

Opinion

MILLER. Circuit Justice.

1 am satisfied that the case comes within the principle of Bradshaw v. Omaha. 1 Neb. 10. .and this court is bound by it. The only doubt I have had is raised by the 15th proposition of Mr. Thurston's printed argument; but. as the present plaintiff is entitled to come into the [673]*673federal court, I see no good reason why he should wait until he is sued in a state court with many others, who may have no such defence as he has, and then ask to remove bis case into the federal court. Therefore, let a decree be entered for the plaintiff, for a perpetual injunction against the collection of the tax. Decree accordingly.

[NOTE. Subsequently the supreme court of Nebraska overruled the case of Bradshaw v. Omaha. Turner v. Althaus, 6 Neb. 64. The circuit court, in Ivountze v. Omaha. Case No. 7,928, follows this last decision of the Nebraska supreme court.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Brownville v. Middleton
1 Neb. 10 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 672, 3 Dill. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-omaha-circtdne-1875.