City of Brownville v. Middleton

1 Neb. 10
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Court,

by Lake, J.,

held that the Supreme Court obtained jurisdiction to review- a judgment at law rendered by the District Court, only by the petition in error. That must be filed with the transcript, and - before the summons issued. Until it was filed, there was no authority for issuing the summons, and the writ was void. It could not be filed afterwards, so as to retain the summons in error which had already been issued and served. The motion to file the petition now as of the date of filing the transcript is denied, and the motion to dismiss the summons is sustained.

Cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Brownville v. Middleton, 1 Neb. 10 (Neb. 1871).

1 Neb. 10 (City of Brownville v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ritchey v. Seeley
93 N.W. 977 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Slobodisky v. Curtis
78 N.W. 522 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Einspahr v. Exchange National Bank
68 N.W. 933 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Jandt v. Deranlieu
61 N.W. 632 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co.
61 N.W. 100 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Benson v. Michael
45 N.W. 276 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1890)
Campbell v. Sutton
12 Neb. 522 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1882)
Oliver v. Omaha
18 F. Cas. 672 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1875)