Olivas v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedOctober 29, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-01769
StatusUnknown

This text of Olivas v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. (Olivas v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olivas v. Lowe's Companies, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 |

4 .

6 . 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . 9 | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |) ANALIA OLIVAS, a minor child, by and Case No.: 21-cv-1769-GPC-RBM 2 sehr Gun ate, 3 ° a ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiff,|_ MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION □ 15 CONFERENCE AND RULE 26 LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC., et al., COMPLIANCE AND CASE 16 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 17 Defendants. 18 “19 . [Doc. 9] 20 21 On October 28, 2021, Plaintiff Analia Olivas, a minor child by and through her 22 || Guardian ad Litem, Alberto Olivas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lowe’s Companies, Inc. 23 (“Defendant”) filed a joint motion to continue early neutral evaluation conference and 24 ||scheduling conference (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. 9.) The parties seek to continue the 25 ||November 22, 2021 early neutral evaluation conference (“ENE”) and case management 26 || conference (“CMC”) to a date after December 1, 2021 as defense counsel and Defendant’s 27 ||primary representative will be unavailable on November 22, 2021 due to vacation plans 28 || and the Thanksgiving holiday. (Jd. at 2.)

1 The undersigned’s October 21, 2021 order set the ENE on November 22, 2021 and 2 ||the deadline to lodge confidential ENE statements on November 10, 2021. (Doc. Tat 3.) 3 | A scheduling order may be modified only upon a showing of good cause and with 4 || the judge’s consent. FED. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); see, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, 5 975 F.2d 604; 609 (9th Cir. 1992) (stating, “the focus of [the good cause] inquiry is 6 || upon the moving party’s reasons for seeking modification.”) 7 Here, the undersigned finds good cause to vacate the current ENE date and to grant - 8 continuance, and thus the Joint Motion is GRANTED. Considering the 45-day timeline 9 || to convene the ENE as set forth in Civil Local Rule 16.1(c), FURTHER REQUESTS TO 10 || CONTINUE THE ENE AND CMC WILL NOT BE GRANTED ABSENT 11 || EXTRAORDINARY GOOD CAUSE. The undersigned’s October 21, 2021 order is 12 amended as follows: 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference of your 14 will be held on December 13, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. before United States Magistrate 15 || Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro of the Southern District of California, United States 16 Courthouse, 2003 W. Adams Ave., El Centro, CA 92243. In the event the case does not 17 ||settle at the ENE, a Case Management Conference pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b) is 18 || set for December 13, 2021, and will be held at the conclusion of the ENE. Although the 19 || Court typically requires personal attendance of all parties, party representatives, including 20 || claims adjusters for insured parties, and primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, 21 to the COVID-19 public emergency the ENE and CMC shall convene through the 22 || Zoom video conferencing platform, as explained below. If circumstances relating to the 23 ||COVID-19 public emergency improve prior to the scheduled date, the Court will notify the 24 || parties that it will conduct the conference in person. 25 The following are mandatory directions for the parties preparing for the ENE. 26 || Absent express permission from this Court, and notwithstanding the pendency of any 27 ||motion, counsel shall timely comply with the dates and deadlines ordered herein. 28

1. Purpose of Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal 2 || discussion between the attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the 3 || lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All ENE discussions will be 4 ||informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for non-English speaking 5 || parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the ENE. 6 2. Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters for insured 7 defendants, and other representatives of a party having full settlement authority as 8 || explained below, and the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must be present 9 legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. Counsel appearing 10 || without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be 11 ||cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may result in immediate termination of 12 ENE. If each of the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation is not listed on the 13 docket as an “ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED,” then they each shall enter'their appearance 14 || on the docket as soon as practicable, but no later than ten calendar days prior to the ENE. 15 Unless extraordinary circumstances exist, persons required to attend the ENE under 16 |/this Order will not be excused from attendance. Requests for excuse from attendance 17 || for extraordinary circumstances shall be filed as a motion at least ten calendar days 18 || before the ENE. Failure to appear at the ENE will be grounds for sanctions. 19 3. Full Settlement Authority Required: In addition to counsel who will try the 20 case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority! must be present for the 21 . 22 .

23 Full settlement authority means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be 24 || authorized to explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement 25 ||terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have unfettered discretion and authority to change © the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 27 ||(D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference contemplates that the person’s view of the case may be altered during 28 the face-to-face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of

1 ||ENE. In the case of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity other than retained 2 || outside counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity 3 ||to pay an amount up to the amount of Plaintiff's prayer (excluding punitive damages 4 || prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle 5 || the case during the ENE without consulting a superior.

6 4. ENE Statements Required: On or before December 1, 2021, Plaintiff and 7 ||Defendant shall lodge statements of five pages or less directly to Magistrate Judge 8 || Montenegro’s chambers outlining the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, and the 9 || parties’ positions regarding settlement of the case. The settlement position must include a 10 || specific and current demand or offer addressing all relief or remedies sought. Ifa specific 11 || demand or offer cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefore 12 ||must be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a 13 ||demand or offer. A general statement that a party will “negotiate in good faith,” “offer a 14 ||nominal cash sum,” or “be prepared to make an offer at the conference” is not a specific 15 ||demand or offer. The statement shall also list all attorney and non-attorney conference 16 |/attendees for that side, including the name(s) and title(s)/position(s) of the party/party 17 representative(s) who will attend and have settlement authority at the conference. □ 18 ENE statements shall be lodged via email at efile montenegro@casd.uscourts.gov. 19 || If exhibits are attached and the total submission amounts to more than twenty pages, a hard 20 ||copy must also be delivered directly to chambers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Olivas v. Lowe's Companies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivas-v-lowes-companies-inc-casd-2021.