Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co

D.C. Circuit

Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co

209 F.2d 793, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 341, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3672

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 28, 1954

Docket19-1185

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 793 (Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co, 209 F.2d 793, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 341, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3672 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

209 F.2d 793

93 U.S.App.D.C. 341

OLIPHANT,
v.
ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.

No. 11764.

United States Court of Appeals
District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 18, 1954.
Decided Jan. 28, 1954.

[93 U.S.App.D.C. 342] Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, Washington, D.C., appellant.

Mr. Robert R. Faulkner, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this suit for personal injuries, the court directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff's case. We agree that there was no substantial evidence in support of the theory that the plaintiff's injuries were caused by negligence on the part of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI