Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
209 F.2d 793, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 341
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1954
DocketNo. 11764
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 209 F.2d 793 (Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R., 209 F.2d 793, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 341 (D.C. Cir. 1954).
Opinion
In this suit for personal injuries, the court directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case. We agree that there was no substantial evidence in support of the theory that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by negligence on the part of the defendant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co
209 F.2d 793 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 F.2d 793, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliphant-v-atlantic-coast-line-r-cadc-1954.