Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Oleksiw v. Weidener

Oleksiw v. Weidener

31 Ohio Law Rep. 50
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oleksiw v. Weidener. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Ohio St. 2d 147 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1965·No. 38769·Published

Opinion

Matthias, Judge.

In a malpractice action, expert testimony may be elicited from a physician defendant called by plaintiff “as if under cross-examination,” pursuant to Section 2317.07, Revised Code.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Herbert and Schneider, JJ., concur. O’Neill and Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oleksiw v. Weidener, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 50 (Ohio 1965).

31 Ohio Law Rep. 50 (Oleksiw v. Weidener) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.