Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Oleksiw v. Weidener

Oleksiw v. Weidener

31 Ohio Law Rep. 50
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 1965
Docket38769
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ohio Law Rep. 50 (Oleksiw v. Weidener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oleksiw v. Weidener, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 50 (Ohio 1965).

Opinion

Matthias, Judge.

In a malpractice action, expert testimony may be elicited from a physician defendant called by plaintiff “as if under cross-examination,” pursuant to Section 2317.07, Revised Code.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Herbert and Schneider, JJ., concur. O’Neill and Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ohio Law Rep. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oleksiw-v-weidener-ohio-1965.