Olds v. Hosford

Wyoming Supreme Court

Olds v. Hosford

359 P.2d 406, 1961 Wyo. LEXIS 77

Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 1961·No. 2918, 2919·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of the appellee’s insistence that there was no issue before the trial court on the question of malice, fraud, oppression or willful wrong on the part of the appellee, we carefully re-examined the entire record, as well as the opinion of this court. This re-examination satisfies us that the very question now insisted upon was sufficiently considered and disposed of in the original opinion.

Furthermore, the remanding of the case to the district court for further proceedings was occasioned by the refusal of the trial court to consider or admit evidence as to recoverability of attorneys’ fees under any circumstance. This was the fundamental, error which made necessary the reversal.

Rehearing denied.

McINTYRE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because of the appellee’s insistence that there was no issue before the trial court on the question of malice, fraud, oppression or willful wrong on the part of the appellee, we carefully re-examined the entire record, as well as the opinion of this court. This re-examination satisfies us that the very question now insisted upon was sufficiently considered and disposed of in the original opinion.

Furthermore, the remanding of the case to the district court for further proceedings was occasioned by the refusal of the trial court to consider or admit evidence as to recoverability of attorneys’ fees under any circumstance. This was the fundamental, error which made necessary the reversal.

Rehearing denied.

McINTYRE, J., not participating.

Olds v. Hosford, 359 P.2d 406, 1961 Wyo. LEXIS 77 (Wyo. 1961).

Pincite

359 P.2d 406 (Olds v. Hosford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related