Oldfield v. State

468 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 1985·No. No. AZ-226·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a thirty month sentence, contending that the trial court erred in relying on an amendment to Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allows a trial court to “bump up” a sentence range to the next higher guidelines “cell” when a defendant’s probation is revoked. Appellant was sentenced prior to July 1, 1984, the effective date of the rule. The trial court’s decision to apply the new rule retroactively to appellant was error. Barnes v. State, 461 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Saunders v. State, 459 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); accord Frazier v. State, 463 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.

SMITH, SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oldfield v. State, 468 So. 2d 446, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1123, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

468 So. 2d 446 (Oldfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elbert v. State
473 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Stubbs v. State
470 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)