Barnes v. State

461 So. 2d 216
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1984·No. AY-206·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

461 So.2d 216 (1984)

James H. BARNES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. AY-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 18, 1984.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Henri C. Cawthon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his sentence complaining that the trial court erred in relying upon an amendment to the sentencing guidelines which provides for "bumping *217 up" a sentence range into the next higher "cell" when a defendant's probation is revoked. See Rule 3.701(d)(14), Fla.R. Crim.P. This rule was not effective until July 1, 1984, several months after appellant was sentenced. While this appeal was pending, this court decided Jackson v. State, 454 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), which holds that this amended rule cannot be applied retroactively. See also Saunders v. State, 459 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); and Randolph v. State, 458 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, appellant's sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. State, 461 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 216 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elbert v. State
473 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Richardson v. State
472 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Dewberry v. State
472 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Scott v. State
469 So. 2d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Oldfield v. State
468 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)