Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n

362 So. 2d 713, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1484

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 362 So. 2d 713 (Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n, 362 So. 2d 713, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record on appeal in the instant case does not contain a transcript of either the trial below or the evidentiary hearing on attorneys’ fees. Because the final judgment in foreclosure appealed relates directly to these matters, we do not have before us an adequate record upon which to review the actions of the trial court. Accordingly, we must assume that the judgment appealed is correct; therefore, we affirm. See, e. g., Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Strickland v. Lewis, 328 So.2d 244 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. Foster, 307 So.2d 502 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County, 298 So.2d 552 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record on appeal in the instant case does not contain a transcript of either the trial below or the evidentiary hearing on attorneys’ fees. Because the final judgment in foreclosure appealed relates directly to these matters, we do not have before us an adequate record upon which to review the actions of the trial court. Accordingly, we must assume that the judgment appealed is correct; therefore, we affirm. See, e. g., Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Strickland v. Lewis, 328 So.2d 244 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. Foster, 307 So.2d 502 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County, 298 So.2d 552 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 So. 2d 713, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okun-v-stuart-house-condominium-assn-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack