Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County

298 So. 2d 552
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1974
Docket74-194
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 298 So. 2d 552 (Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County, 298 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

298 So.2d 552 (1974)

Mildred BUTLER, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, and Fred Grant, Appellees.

No. 74-194.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 13, 1974.

Jerry A. Burns, Miami, for appellant.

Phillip J. Goldstein and John E. Finney, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals on adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of defendant-appellees Dade County and Fred Grant in this action to recover for personal injuries.

On January 19, 1972 plaintiff, Mildred Butler, was a passenger on an M.T.A. bus which was forced to make a sudden stop when a green automobile cut in front of it. As a result thereof, plaintiff was hurled out of her seat and sustained personal injuries thereby. Plaintiff filed the instant suit to recover damages for her injuries against Dade County, Fred Grant, who was the driver of the bus, and Boleslaw Jan Grantsch and Isidore Roffer, both or one of whom allegedly operated their motor vehicles negligently. Defendants Dade County and Fred Grant moved for summary judgment. After a full hearing thereon, the trial judge granted summary judgment in favor of Dade County and Grant. This appeal followed.

After an examination of the record on appeal, we find that there are material portions omitted therefrom upon which the trial judge relied in his determination to *553 grant defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment herein appealed must be and hereby is affirmed. See, e.g., Althouse v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 859.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ALINER J. HARRIS v. HGA-LAND HOLDINGS, LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Morgan v. Pake
611 So. 2d 1315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Musgrave v. Calder Race Course, Inc.
404 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n
362 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Nachman v. Rubin
357 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Forte v. Tripp & Skrip
339 So. 2d 698 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Martinez v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Miami
338 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 So. 2d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1974.