O'KEEFE v. Dunn

219 A.2d 872, 47 N.J. 210
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 23, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.2d 872 (O'KEEFE v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'KEEFE v. Dunn, 219 A.2d 872, 47 N.J. 210 (N.J. 1966).

Opinion

47 N.J. 210 (1966)
219 A.2d 872

MAURICE A. O'KEEFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS G. DUNN, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 9, 1966.
Decided May 23, 1966.

Mr. Edward W. McGrath argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. William Miller argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court in its opinion reported in 89 N.J. Super. 383 (Law Div. 1965).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'KEEFE v. Dunn
215 A.2d 66 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
O'Keefe v. Dunn
219 A.2d 872 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.2d 872, 47 N.J. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeefe-v-dunn-nj-1966.