O'KEEFE v. Dunn
This text of 219 A.2d 872 (O'KEEFE v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MAURICE A. O'KEEFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS G. DUNN, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Edward W. McGrath argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. William Miller argued the cause for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court in its opinion reported in 89 N.J. Super. 383 (Law Div. 1965).
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.2d 872, 47 N.J. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okeefe-v-dunn-nj-1966.