Oister v. Pennsylvania
This text of 378 U.S. 568 (Oister v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OISTER
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Joseph Knox Fornance for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 568, 84 S. Ct. 1926, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oister-v-pennsylvania-scotus-1964.