Oister v. Pennsylvania
378 U.S. 568, 84 S. Ct. 1926, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 855
Opinion
OISTER
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Joseph Knox Fornance for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568, 84 S. Ct. 1926, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 855 (1964).
378 U.S. 568 (Oister v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
John F. Bogacki and Mary Ann Bogacki, a Partnership Doing Business as Royal Lanes v. American MacHine & Foundry Company, a Corporation
417 F.2d 400 (Third Circuit, 1969)
United States of America Ex Rel. Edwin Gockley v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania
411 F.2d 216 (Third Circuit, 1969)
Application of Billie
429 P.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
276 F. Supp. 748 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)
Griffin v. California
380 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
206 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)