O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
146 A. 370, 105 N.J.L. 642, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 290
This text of 146 A. 370 (O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 146 A. 370, 105 N.J.L. 642, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
NJ Highway Authority v. Sills
268 A.2d 308 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Stephens v. Bongart
189 A. 131 (Essex County Family Court, 1937)
Weatherby v. Aetna Insurance
167 A. 877 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 370, 105 N.J.L. 642, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogorman-young-inc-v-phoenix-assurance-co-nj-1929.