Oglesby v. Hanson
66 S.E. 802, 7 Ga. App. 318, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 259
Opinion
To authorize a money verdict in a trover suit there must be some evidence to show the value of the personal property converted by the defendant. Brooke v. Lowe, 122 Ga, 358 (50 S. E. 146) ; Bell v. Ober, 96 Ga. 214 (23 S. E. 7). Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oglesby v. Hanson, 66 S.E. 802, 7 Ga. App. 318, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 259 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
66 S.E. 802 (Oglesby v. Hanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colonial Hill Co. v. Moncrief Furnace Co.
158 S.E. 343 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Gamble v. Shingler
96 S.E. 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Lott v. Banks
94 S.E. 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Moats v. Farkas
88 S.E. 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Young v. Durham
84 S.E. 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)