Moats v. Farkas

88 S.E. 685, 17 Ga. App. 778, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 929
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 17, 1916·No. 6693·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

This was a suit in trover to recover a mule. The plaintiff having elected to take a money verdict, and the allegations in his petition as to the value of the property having been denied in the answer, and there being no evidence whatever as to the value of the property, the verdict for the plaintiff' was without evidence to support it. Bell v. Oler, 96 Ga. 214 (23 S. E. 7); Brooke v. Lowe, 122 Ga. 358 (4), 361 (50 S. E. 146); Oglesby v. Hanson, 7 Ga. App. 318 (66 S. E. 802); Peeples v. Felton, 14 Ga. App. 5 (80 S. E. 21); Young v. Durham, 15 Ga. App. 678 (84 S. E. 165). Judgment reversed.

Russell, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moats v. Farkas, 88 S.E. 685, 17 Ga. App. 778, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 929 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 685 (Moats v. Farkas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downs v. Berryman
100 S.E. 226 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)