Ogidi-Abegbaje v. Nassau Community College
This text of Ogidi-Abegbaje v. Nassau Community College (Ogidi-Abegbaje v. Nassau Community College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X 3/10/2020 11 :52 am MICHAEL OGIDI-ABEGAJE, U . S . D IST RICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, LONG ISLAND OFFICE ORDER -against- 19-CV-5519 (JMA) (ARL)
NASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------X JOAN M. AZRACK, District Judge: On September 19, 2019, pro se plaintiff Michael Ogidi-Abegaje (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Nassau Community College (“defendant”) together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. By Transfer Order dated September 23, 2019, the case was transferred to this Court and, on September 30, 2019, it was assigned to the undersigned. On October 23, 2019, plaintiff filed another application to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons that follow, the applications to proceed in forma pauperis are denied without prejudice and with leave to renew upon completion of the AO 239 in forma pauperis application form. Alternatively, plaintiff may remit the $400.00 filing fee. Plaintiff has checked the box on the forms to indicate that he is not employed and reports that he has not received any money from any source within the last twelve (12) months. (-Se-e D.E. 1 at ¶¶ 2-3 and D.E. 7 at ¶¶ 2-3.) Plaintiff avers that he has no money in cash or in a checking or savings account and he reports no regular monthly expenses, including housing, transportation, utilities, or otherwise. However, although plaintiff provides a residential
1 address, he avers on the second application that he is homeless. Thus, because the responses provided by plaintiff on the in forma pauperis application do not permit the Court to conclude that plaintiff is qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff’s applications are denied without prejudice to a renewal thereof upon completion of the AO 239 in forma pauperis application form annexed to this Order. Under the circumstances, plaintiff can best set forth his current financial position on the long form in forma pauperis application (AO 239). Plaintiff is directed to either remit the $400.00 filing fee or complete and return the enclosed in forma pauperis
application within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that a failure to timely comply with this Order will lead to the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice and judgment will enter. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order and the AO 239 in forma pauperis application form to the plaintiff at his last known address.
SO ORDERED. _____/s/ (JMA)_________________ Joan M. Azrack United States District Judge
Dated: March 10, 2020 Central Islip, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ogidi-Abegbaje v. Nassau Community College, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogidi-abegbaje-v-nassau-community-college-nyed-2020.