Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spangler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spangler

849 A.2d 1132

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 24, 2004·No. Nos. 679 and 763 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 9, 2004, the Petition for Review and responses thereto, the Petition for Review is denied and it is hereby

ORDERED that Jeffrey Thomas Span-gler be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of eighteen months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 9, 2004, the Petition for Review and responses thereto, the Petition for Review is denied and it is hereby

ORDERED that Jeffrey Thomas Span-gler be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of eighteen months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spangler, 849 A.2d 1132 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

849 A.2d 1132 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spangler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.